| Canada. Parliament. Senate - Canada - 1919 - 978 pages
...to do so in the event of there being any doubt as to returns being properly made. Hon. Mr. BOSTOCK: But I would like to point out to the committee that the clause which my honourable friend has read applies only to the accounts. The by-laws •of the company... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - Damages - 1935 - 60 pages
...against which the specific insurance is directed. I will not go further in detail in that connection, but I would like to point out to the committee that the measure (S. 1080) in effect makes three changes in existing law. It makes the remedy under the Jones... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations - 1945 - 904 pages
...reduction in the cost of this item ? Colonel ILLIG. Yes, sir; we will be glad to insert that in the record, but I would like to point out to the committee that the supply control report, used as a basis for this estimate, reflects this item as a requirement and does... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services - 1953 - 188 pages
...Now, I don't mean to infer that because of that one little fact, the Defense Department is all wet. But I would like to point out to the committee that the Defense Department before it issued this statement did not consult the records that it has. And with... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Appropriations - 1956 - 2022 pages
...this enterprise, in view of the considerable amount of money that the Government has been asked for. But I would like to point out to the committee that the condition of the Delaware River between the citv and the bay is dependent in considerable amount upon... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations - 1970 - 1866 pages
...same project, is $92,000. Mr. XATCHER. $92,000. MORGAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT AND ADDITION Now, Mr. Woodson, you have just informed the committee...be $5,963,000. That is the construction cost. Mr. XATCHER. Instead of the figure we have of $6,595,000? Mr. BLASER. No, sir, instead of the $4,782,000... | |
| |