 | Eugene Wambaugh - Constitutional law - 1915 - 1106 pages
...infected clothing, obscene books or pictures, or instruments which can only be used for illegal purposes. While the legislature has no right arbitrarily to...exercise a large liberty of choice in the means employed. Newark Railway v. Hunt, 50 NJ Law, 308; Blasier v. Miller, 10 Hun, 435; Mouse's Case, 12 Rep. G3; Stone... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 1044 pages
...only be used for illegal purposes. While the legislature has no right arbitrarily to declare that tobe a nuisance which is clearly not so, a good deal must...and if the object to be accomplished is conducive 1o the public interests, it may exercise a large liberty of choice in the means employed. Newark &... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1928 - 1062 pages
...nature will be sustained. Radiée v. People, 264 Ü. S. 292-294, 44 S. Ct. 325, 68 L. Ed. 690. Where "the object to be accomplished is conducive to the public interests, it [the Legislature] may exercise a large liberty of choice in the means employed." Lawton v. Steele,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1928 - 1142 pages
...this nature will be sustained. Radico v. People, 264 US 292-294, 44 S. Ct 325, 68 L. Ed. 690. Where "the object to be accomplished is conducive to the public interests, it [the Legislature] may exercise a large liberty of choice in the means employed." Lawton v. Steele,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1904 - 1164 pages
...summarily destroyed." And on page 140, 102 US, page 502, 14 Sup. Ct., 38 L. Ed. 385, the court says: "While the Legislature has no right arbitrarily to...nuisance which is clearly not so, a good deal must bo left to its discretion in that regard; and. if the object to be accomplished is conducive to the... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Charles Frederick Remy, George Washington Self, Philip Zoercher, William H. Adams, Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Emma Mary May - Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 874 pages
...conditions in respect to property which cannot be said to amount to a common-law nuisance, yet even the legislature has no right arbitrarily to declare that to be a nuisance which, both in its general and particular application, is clearly not such. City of Eransville v. Miller (1897),... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 1380 pages
...infected clothing, obscene books or pictures, or instruments which can only be used for illegal purposes. While the legislature has no right arbitrarily to...exercise a large liberty of choice in the means employed. Newark & 8. 0. HCR Co. v. Hunt 50 NJL 808; Blazier v. Miller, 10 Hun, 435 ; Mouths Case, 12 Coke, 62;... | |
 | Donald Scherer - Environmental ethics - 254 pages
...as torts under common law.'0 Although the Supreme Court has held that "the legislature has no right to declare that to be a nuisance which is clearly not so,"" it has deferred to legislative findings as long as they met procedural due process requirements. Thus,... | |
 | District of Columbia. Health Department - Public health - 1903 - 340 pages
...limitations not yet definitely settled. As was said by Mr. Justice Brown, in Lawton v. Steele (152 US, 140): "While the legislature has no right arbitrarily to...object to be accomplished is conducive to the public interest, it may exercise a large liberty of choice in the means employed." It would seem that no certain... | |
| |
While the legislature has no right arbitrarily to declare that to be a nuisance which is clearly not so, a good deal must be left to its discretion in that regard, and if the object to be accomplished is conducive to the public interests, it may exercise... 
